The fun encyclopedia of animals is here! See pictures, wallpapers and videos and read fun reviews of products for animals, how tos, and fun stories about our animal friends here.
African penguins, the tourist attraction near Cape Town, South Africa, which are the continents only flightless bird are on the verge of being extinct. This rapid decline has led to a ban on commercial fishing in four key areas seven years ago to see whether that could help save the penguins
Although officials have put a ban on fishing in almost four key areas seven years ago to help save the penguins. But still scientists are debating whether fishing is the only major threat to the population of the species.
As per experts, if the present situation continued, then in no time the specie will disappear. In the 1930s, South Africa's largest colony had a several million of African penguins. But at present only 100,000 of the birds remain in all of South Africa and neighboring Namibia, the only places where the species exists.
Anchovies and sardines, which are the biggest components of South Africa's fishing industry, are also the primary food sources of the African penguins. Both fisheries scientists and bird specialists agree that the decline of the penguin began around 2004 with a shift in anchovies and sardines away from the colonies.
Scientists said they are still not sure why the fish have moved from the colonies, but they hypotheses that the possible cause could be climate change, overfishing and natural fluctuations.
So far several penguins have died or abandoned their chicks, with hundreds winding up in the crowded outdoor pens of a rehabilitation center run by the Southern African Foundation for the Conservation of Coastal Birds, which releases rehabilitated penguins into the wild every week.
Following the death of my childhood pet—a black cat named Neo—I had
an extended mourning period that included a lot of open weeping and
melodramatic Instagram posts.
Hal Herzog is a professor of psychology at Western Carolina
University who analyzes humans’ interactions with animals. Speaking
about household pets in particular, Herzog said said that people get
attached to animals for a number of reasons, but that it’s mostly a
combination of our biology and our need for affection.
As for the biology: “When you touch and look at your pet, it makes
your brain release chemicals that make you feel good,” Herzog said.
As for the need for affection: That boils down to the fact that pets offer unconditional love (mostly). And unconditional love feels good.
This partly explains why so many people–about 60 percent of households, according to the Humane Society of the United States–currently own pets in the U.S. But making us feel better can’t be the only
reason animals have climbed up the social ranks to be nearly equal with
other humans, which is something that Herzog said is definitely not culturally universal.
Herzog said that while animals, especially dogs, are part of the
lives of humans in many countries, they are not revered as family
members in most other cultures. Americans have specifically come to
idealize two animals–cats and dogs–more than any other.
Somewhere along the line, Westerners came to love certain animals so much that we allow them to sleep in our beds.
Herzog pointed to the influence of pet-centric media and
advertising. The pet industry markets pets as desirable companions,
loving creatures that will make you feel less lonely and make your life
more satisfying.
Herzog also noted the impact of animals’ portrayals in popular culture and how that might be related to our desire to own pets.
“When I was a kid, we got a TV, and my favorite show was Lassie,” Herzog said. “And Lassie was Teddy’s best friend. And they treated him like a member of the family.”
Marley & Me didn’t fail to deliver gut-punches that tapped into the way some of us feel about dogs.
Moreover, changing demographics are motivating people to get more and
more pets, Herzog said. As the structure of the average American
household continues to change, spaces are created that are easily
occupied by animals.
“American demographics have changed, and more people are living
alone. People are getting married later, if they get married at all.
They’re having fewer kids,” Herzog said. “People are more attached to
their pets [because they’re filling a hole].”
That all accounts for why we like them so much. But do we really like them more than human beings?
Herzog doesn’t think so.
We only allow two types of animals to become family members: cats and
dogs. Barring that, we don’t really develop deep, emotional bonds with
animals (well, most of us don’t).
Second in the hierarchy of critters-that-matter-to-people are what
Herzog calls “charismatic megafauna,” or what he describes as “big, cool
animals.” These are, he said, “giraffes, lions, orcas, dolphins,
chimpanzees,” and the like.
Lions like Cecil, the 13-year-old Southwest African Lion whose death in July sparked worldwide outrage.
Herzog said that Cecil had the right combination of positive
characteristics to cause public outrage about animal cruelty. Not only
did he fall into the category of beasts that we, as Americans, care
about, he also had a few other things going for him:
“Cecil wasn’t just any lion. He was really well-known,” Herzog said.
“He was charismatic. There were pictures of him everywhere.”
“It was the perfect storm of how to get the whole world in a tizzy,” Herzog said of the circumstances surrounding Cecil’s death.
According to Herzog, any animal that doesn’t belong to one of two
categories–household pets or adorable zoo animals–doesn’t matter to us
as much. Just looking at America’s propensity to eat certain critters on the regular proves that we seriously prioritize the lives of some animals over others.
“There’s a general principal in psychology called the collapse of
compassion,” Herzog said. “This principle [says] that the bigger the
tragedy, the less people care. So people don’t care that much about the
slaughter of chickens and the treatment of cattle. What gets people
going is pictures of the individual suffering of animals.”
“I just don’t think it’s true that we
care about animals than people. When you look at the big picture, it’s
just not true,” Herzog said.
“What we care about is individuals,” Herzog said. “Especially ones that are helpless.”
This was best demonstrated by a study out of Northeastern University that
tracked people’s reactions to fake news stories about beatings that
happened to either dogs, puppies, human adults, or human babies.
According to the study, which was conducted by professors Jack Levin, an expert in violent crimes and mass murderers, and Arnold Arluke, a professor of sociology who studies the psychological and emotionallink
between animals and humans, “adult human crime victims receive less
empathy than do child, puppy, and full grown dog victims.”
So it’s not the difference between human and animal–it’s the innocence of the victim.
“Humans can speak for themselves, as a group, while animals are
helpless,” Herzog said. “People are [sometimes] more interested in
helping animals because animals can’t help themselves.”
So there’s the reason you weep at the Sarah McLachlan commercials
(the song doesn’t help), and why I cried for days after my cat died, and
why we talk a lot about animals who were killed unfairly.
We don’t feel bad for them because they’re animals. We feel bad for them because, for the most part, they’re innocent.
The orphaned baby sea otter was as sad and
winsome as any cartoon animal Disney ever put on screen. Last October,
the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Monterey Bay
Aquarium rescued a tiny pup that appeared to be abandoned by her mother
on a beach near Santa Cruz. Stranded and crying, she was thought to be
less than a week old and weighed just over 2 pounds, the smallest baby
otter found in years.
Luna Lovegood, after all, is a heroine
at the Hogwarts school of wizardry. Like magic, the name won.
Luna appeared on lots of news outlet lists of the cutest animals of
2014. But it’s not just about cute. “Luna has captured the attention of
millions of people and highlighted the plight of sea otters,” says Tim
Binder, who oversees animal care and the rescue rehab program at Shedd.
“She’s become a great ambassador for research and been a great
ambassador for the conservation work not just for Shedd but for all zoos
and aquariums.”
Luna was a rare occasion when public opinion seemed to turn, if just
slightly, toward supporting a belief that many in the animal
conservation world hold: that captivity, when done right, is a valuable
conservation tool.
It’s a hot button issue, to be sure. SeaWorld is perhaps the biggest
red target for those who say animal captivity is inherently wrong. The
criticism of SeaWorld’s theme parks—from the influential 2013
documentary Blackfish to Harry Styles of the British boy band
One Direction shouting “Does anybody like dolphins?” and then “Don’t go
to SeaWorld” onstage in San Diego on July 9—has set in motion plenty of
public outcry. For the past few years, attendance and revenue have
generally declined, although earlier in 2015 there were signs of a potential bounce-back.
But it’s also caused waves of consternation in nonprofit aquariums
and zoos. “The film is not fully accurate, and it portrays events that
happened 30 years ago as contemporary,” says Binder. “The unfortunate
thing is that people are taking that film at face value.”
Their concern is that aquariumgoers now feel conflicted and confused
when they see sea mammals in captivity and with animal trainers, after
seeing and hearing emotion-evoking claims about poor treatment of
“captive” animals. But many of the animals and fish in facilities
accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) are rehab and
rescue animals, some deemed “non-releasable” by wildlife officials.
“Almost all black bears, brown—grizzly and Kodiak—bears, puma,
bobcat, harbor seals, walrus, sea otters and moose are rehab animals,”
says AZA executive Rob Vernon. With a few zoo and aquarium-born
exceptions, most sea lions and gray seals in accredited AZA facilities
are non-releasable, rehabilitated animals. Fish like sturgeon or pupfish
in AZA tanks are part of zoo and aquarium-based breeding and release
programs for the federal or state endangered species recovery program.
The majority of public zoos and aquariums consider conservation and
research to be their key missions. For example, last year the New
England Aquarium rehabilitated and released 733 sea turtles (of both
threatened and endangered species) stranded on the beaches of Cape Cod.
It was part of an annual event that typically releases 90 of the
creatures (2014 was a banner year). The New England Aquarium has also
been studying the North Atlantic right whale in the wild for the past 40
years and is involved in changing government policy to decrease
human-caused mortality by entanglement, marine gear and vessel
collision. On top of that, the aquarium has designed fishing gear that’s
less likely to snare whales.
Last summer, the Vancouver Aquarium rescued a marooned false killer
whale (not directly related to the killer whale) calf that it named
Chester. The aquarium has been rehabbing Chester, who was deemed
non-releasable by the Fisheries and Oceans Canada. In a YouTube-worthy
tale of animal friendship, Chester is now rooming with Helen, a rescued
Pacific white-sided dolphin. Vancouver animal care staff say the
integration has exceeded their expectations. “I am extremely impressed
by his medical behaviors already,” reports head veterinarian Dr. Martin
Haulena.
SeaWorld is an interesting case study. The organization has a
documented history of poor environmental stewardship—killer whales and
their pods were disrupted by the repeated SeaWorld captures of the same
Puget Sound pods in the 1960s and 1970s—but also a pretty good track
record of conservation. SeaWorld says it has not taken any whales or
dolphins from the wild in the past 35 years.
Over the past 50 years, SeaWorld has rescued more than 26,000
ocean animals. SeaWorld scientists have published some 300 research
papers that have been shared with the scientific community, including
ones on killer whales’ metabolism, reproduction and vocal learning.
SeaWorld is an institution accredited by the AZA. The SeaWorld park in
San Diego was first accredited by the AZA in 1981, and each of its other
parks has continually met AZA standards in a vetting process that takes
place every five years.
Critics contend that for a long time, SeaWorld didn’t take
conservation seriously enough. “While SeaWorld has done good work over
the years with marine mammal rescues off Florida and California, its
record with regard to research and conservation work that helps wild
orca populations is not very impressive,” says Tim Zimmerman, the
associate producer of Blackfish and writer of the Outside feature “Killer in the Pool” on which the documentary was based.
“Prior to Blackfish, as best we could calculate, SeaWorld
spent considerably less than 1 percent of its annual revenues on
conservation work,” Zimmerman says. “And very little, if any, of that
was devoted to helping the endangered southern resident killer whales,
which are a threatened population in part because of the generation of
young female breeders that SeaWorld and other marine parks removed from
the population in the 1960s and 1970s.”
Similarly, he argues, most of the research SeaWorld conducted on
killer whales didn’t benefit wild populations. Rather, it was directed
toward captive husbandry and breeding that “could help SeaWorld better
care for and expand its captive killer whale population. In short, Blackfish
helped push SeaWorld to start matching its actions on conservation and
research with its long-standing claims regarding conservation and
research.”
After Blackfish was released, SeaWorld promised to donate
$10 million to fund research and conservation for killer whales in the
wild. (SeaWorld says that the announcement was unrelated to the film.)
Recently, it committed $1.5 million to the National Fish and Wildlife
Foundation as part of that pledge. And earlier this month the company
announced it will no longer accept any of the 18 captured Russian beluga
whales it had planned on housing as part of a breeding loan from the
Georgia Aquarium, which, in turn, has been trying to import them from
their home at Russia’s Utrish Marine Mammal Research Station. A
statement from SeaWorld says the decision not to accept the animals
“reflects an evolution in SeaWorld’s position since this project began
more than eight years ago.” SeaWorld
gives universities and research organizations access to its animals.
Scientists conduct studies on subjects such as killer whales’
metabolism, vocal learning, sleep patterns, life history, reproduction
and the impact of toxins and viruses on wild whales.SeaWorld
Many of SeaWorld’s online critics see this about-face as a vindication of recent protests. Blackfish
director Gabriela Cowperthwaite says that since the film’s release,
SeaWorld has been in “damage control mode.” However, she adds, “although
we consider that progress, we continue to wonder why SeaWorld needs
performing orcas to continue conservation work.”
Meanwhile, the Blackfish backlash has affected not only how
people view animals in captivity at both for-profit water parks and
conservation centers like SeaWorld but also nonprofit zoos and
aquariums, particularly when these latter programs are designed to
entertain animals as well as humans. Consider Shedd, which was targeted
in a Blackfish-inspired “Empty the Tanks”
protest in 2013, during which activists called for the release of
captive whales and dolphins. Shedd’s long history of marine wildlife
rescue and rehab programs includes extensive studies of its beluga
whales; aquarists there say that their training program is essential for
the beluga's welfare. Though some people might view the training
process of the whales as abuse for human entertainment, the aquarists
say this is a misunderstanding.
“Sometimes someone might say, ‘Aww, you made him do something he
didn’t want to do,’” says Ramirez, who has been training animals for 30
years. “But if you see someone throw a tennis ball and a dog chases it,
you wouldn’t say, ‘The dog didn’t want to do that.’ That’s dog
behavior.”
He adds, “A lot of people aren’t aware that in modern training at
zoos and aquariums today there is no punishment. Most training is done
through gaining the cooperation of the animal and building that
relationship through positive reinforcement.”
In the larger scheme of things, keeping wildlife in captivity poses
little threat to the survival of the species. The Dolphin Research
Center and the World Wildlife Foundation have stated that the main
menaces to whales and dolphins are climate change, whaling, ship
strikes, entanglement in fishing gear, pollutants, toxic contamination
and the oil industry. Aquariums and research institutes do not make
their lists. The main immediate dangers to the mammals are “almost
certainly entanglement or entrapment in fishing gear,” says Randall
Reeves, the chair of the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Of course, the practice of purposefully capturing sea mammals for
display, study and entertainment raises ethical issues, many of which
are still being heatedly debated. The wild killer whales that were the
subject of Blackfish are still being disrupted by captures in
Russia today and sent to new aquariums in China and Moscow, says Erich
Hoyt of Whale and Dolphin Conservation, in England, and the Far East
Russia Orca Project.
But aquariums that host and study rescued marine mammals might have a
role to play in saving, for example, New Zealand’s Maui dolphin and
West Africa’s Atlantic humpbacked dolphin, which are so endangered that
Reeves warns they could disappear within a decade. As Bindi Irwin, a
SeaWorld “youth ambassador” and daughter of the late Australian
naturalist and TV personality Steve Irwin, asks, “If we didn’t have
animals in captivity, would we be inspired to save them?”
In a world where the lives of animals are nearly always considered to be unimportant and disposable, it is almost miraculous that so many humans out there are beginning to say “no” to that concept, and do whatever they can to provide animals with the care and consideration that they need.
Some of the lessons that animal sanctuaries can teach us include: we are not the only species on this Earth deserving of love and respect; other animals have thoughts, feelings, and desires of their own – which deserve to be acknowledged, even if we cannot fully understand them; and their right to life should supersede any “services” that we believe they should perform for us. The continued presence of these places, where threatened, neglected, or abused animals can live in peace, is vitally important.
However, a significant number of these places are struggling to keep performing their incredible work. With this mind, we decided to profile a selection of awe-inspiring sanctuaries that are sadly hovering on the brink of closure, and provide more detail as to how you can help them.
Sadly, SanWild has been threatened by the prospect of closure on a number of occasions. Last year,
Joubert warned that unless long-term sponsorship could be found, the
“very harsh reality” of closure could be imminent. It has weathered many
storms but is now struggling to cope once again after being hit by one
of the worst droughts it has seen in many years.
On Facebook, the organization said
the current dry spell has been “the worst since the inception of our
trust in 2000. We are desperate to find sufficient funding to ensure we
can provide a little bit of a helping hand for our animals and prevent
them from starving until the first rains arrive around mid-December. We
are doing what we can, but we simply do not have sufficient funding to
provide the animals with what they need. As they are living inside an
area fenced off for their protection they have nowhere else to turn for
food. As one drives through the reserve wild animals run after our
vehicle in order to get a bit of what we can afford to provide. The
situation is dire and we are all suffering emotionally but for the sake
of those that really need us, we need to be strong and need to continue
to knock on all doors to get them the help they need to survive.”
You can help SanWild at this critical time by making a donation through their website.
The Lighthouse Farm Sanctuary – named in honor of a local beacon
on Oregon’s Yaquina Head which has “guided those in need to protection
and safe harbor” since 1872 – aims to “guide animals in need to the
safety of calm waters.” Its residents include over 100 cows, goats,
chickens, turkeys, pigs, llamas, rabbits, horses, and geese.
One of their recent rescues, a sweet white-and-brown rabbit named Popeye,
came to Lighthouse with a severe eye injury that required surgical
treatment. During his time with the staff and volunteers of the
sanctuary, Popeye learned how to
“warm up to human affection and even seem(ed) not to mind receiving
meeds while snuggled on a loving lap.” After undergoing surgery to help
fix his eye, and being neutered, he was at last ready to go to “his new forever home!”
The Lighthouse team consider their residents to be friends:
“They light up our day, strengthen our resolve and fill a spiritual
space with love, acceptance, trust and calm. We could learn a lot from
their acceptance of each other – they don’t seem to mind what color
someone’s hair is or the size of their waist or the language they speak.
When it comes to nap time it’s one big snugglefest!”
In July, we reported on this organization’s efforts to tackle a crippling debt problem that has sadly been creeping up on them over time. Paula Fordham, Lighthouse treasurer, said of their financial situation, “I want the public to know that … we’re all committed to the sanctuary’s success. All of us have used our own money to pay for veterinary care for some of these animals.” The dedicated Lighthouse team have set up a YouCaring campaign page to help save the sanctuary, which has attracted $27,151 in donations at the time of writing. Their total fundraising goal is $325,000. You can also donate directly to their website, or apply to work as a volunteer.
Juliana’s Animal Sanctuary,
located in the Andes mountains, is the first farm animal refuge of its
kind in Colombia, and one of only two such sanctuaries in South America.
It is also the ONLY sanctuary in South America that protects cows, in a
continent famed for ”its
rearing of cattle to support the expanding burger industries in the
United States, China and Europe.” It was founded in 2009, “with a desire
to protect one of the most abused animals in the world: cows.”
Future plans include the sponsoring of a mass trap-neuter-return program for the estimated 350,000 street dogs of Bogotà,
along with various education and reconnection programs for
schoolchildren to bring about a change in their perception of farm
animals. Through their new Lunes Sin Carne website, they hope to start running vegan cooking classes and educate the public about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Juliana’s Farm Sanctuary does not receive any government funding. Unfortunately, the prevalence of poverty and social problems
in the country (up to 50 percent of Colombian people are believed to
live below the poverty line) has limited many animal-loving Colombians’
ability to help the sanctuary. Earlier this year, founder Juliana
Castaneda Turner told
One Green Planet, “I’ve been working alone the last nine years trying
to support my project, and at most I would receive on average about $25
in donations from Colombians. It’s not that people don’t care about
animals, many do, but their focus is on more critical things like
putting food on the table and paying their bills.”
A YouCaring campaign page – called Help Pola the Pig to Save Colombia’s Only Animal Sanctuary, in reference to one of its adorable residents, Pola the Freedom-Fighting Pig – has currently raised $8,067 out of its $25,000 goal. A recent update to the page reminded
all potential donors that “every dollar counts. Even $5 goes a long way
in this country. We are getting closer and closer to our goal.” You can
choose to donate to this trail-blazing organization through the YouCaring page or their website. Alternatively, why not become a member, or even volunteer?
In February, we profiled the amazing Santuario Gaia, a Spanish farm animal sanctuary working to change popular perceptions of farm animals by showing people what unique individuals they really are. Co-founder Coque Fernández explained,
“The peacefulness of the place is ideal for the nonhuman animals who
arrive here, most of them in a terrible state, both physical and
emotional. It helps them to recover faster and provides them with a home
to live in peace and harmony.”
Unfortunately, the sanctuary has lost its original home … but
Fernandéz and the rest of the team are now seeking to start afresh on a
different piece of land. They have stated on their new YouCaring page, Help Us Build the New Santuario Gaia: “Santuario Gaia is a shelter for so-considered farm animals. A place where those have suffered exploitation, abuse and neglect,
receive the necessary life-long care to spend with dignity the rest of
their natural days. Until now, the sanctuary has been situated in Ogassa
(Girona, Spain) on a privileged spot, surrounded by forests, rivers and
mountains, but unfortunately we lost this place and we’ve been through a
very difficult time. However, the sun always comes up after the storm
and today a new era has started for the sanctuary as we are moving to a
new place. Now we, and the animals at the sanctuary, need your support
more than ever.”
As you can tell, the Gaia team are not about to give up on the 260
animals who depend on their care without a fight. To help them with
their goal of rebuild a new home, why not donate through their YouCaring page or their website? You can also apply to be a part-time or full-time volunteer.
There is no doubt about it … attempting to run and finance an animal sanctuary, in a world where most people only value animals as commodities, can be incredibly difficult. As animal lovers, one of the most important things we can do for them is to raise awareness of their plight in any way that we can, and support all those who have the courage to speak out and work tirelessly
on their behalf. Share this article to spread awareness of these
awesome sanctuaries’ work, and be sure to support any other amazing
rescue organizations whose mission is close to your heart! Lead image source: Juliana’s Animal Sanctuary/Facebook
Seeing images of wild animals in a hospital — a setting normally reserved for humans — conjures up a few emotions.
There's an immediate sadness of seeing an animal that is sick or in
need of medical care, but there's also a feeling of awe and gratitude.
We very rarely get to see such beautiful and regal creatures up close
and personal and so vulnerable. While some of these images can evoke
feelings of anguish, they also remind us that some animals are fortunate
enough to receive some of the best and most nurturing medical care on
the planet.
Reuters photographers have taken
incredible photos of animals receiving top-notch treatment in
veterinary hospitals, clinics, and zoos across the globe. Check out
these unbelievable photos below.
A 2-year-old orangutan gets a checkup at Kao Pratubchang Conservation Centre in Ratchaburi, Thailand.
Athit Perawongmetha/Reuters
Veterinarians
at an animal hospital in Shenyang, China steady a Eurasian eagle-owl,
who suffered a bone fracture in its right wing, during an x-ray.
China Stringer Network/Reuters
Veterinarians give a cheetah cub a health check at Chester Zoo in northern England.
Phil Noble/Reuters
Budapest
Zoo's oldest gorilla, Liesel, is prepped for an operation in Budapest.
She was 32 at the time of this photo, which was taken in 2009.
POOL New/Reuters
Giant panda Lin Hui's cub is measured by a veterinarian at the Chiang Mai Zoo in the Thailand.
Stringer Thailand/Reuters
Zoo staff prep 19-year-old brown bear, Mango, for surgery at the Ramat Gan Safari near Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nir Elias/Reuters
A koala named Petra gets medication after an operation at Sydney Wildlife World in Australia.
Mick Tsikas/Reuters
A biologist applies medicine to a freshwater turtle in a clinic in La Garita de Alajuela, Costa Rica.
Juan Carlos Ulate/Reuters
Tango,
an 11-year-old male jaguar, gets his teeth cleaned during a full
medical examination at the Buenos Aires Zoo in Argentina.
Enrique Marcarian/Reuters
A
team of veterinarians and zoo staff prepare 8-year-old lion, Samuni,
for surgery at the Ramat Gan Safari Zoo near Tel Aviv, Israel.
Baz Ratner/Reuters
Nearly 18-year-old lioness, Fafa, gets a scanned at a veterinary clinic in Brazil.
Ueslei Marcelino/Reuters
Baby kangaroo, Tijana, peeks out of an incubator in the Belgrade zoo in Serbia.
Ivan Milutinovic/Reuters
20-year-old marine loggerhead turtle, Fender, gets a scan in Beit Dagan, Israel.
Gil Cohen Magen/Reuters
Thai veterinarians give a smuggled orangutan a health check-up and draw blood for a DNA test in Ratchaburi, Thailand.
Chaiwat Subprasom/Reuters
An injured panda is prepped for a scan at the Fourth Military Medical University in Xi'an, China.
China Daily China Daily Information Corp/Reuters
A veterinarian in Pontianak, Indonesia gives Anyin, a sick orangutan, a check-up as it awaits transportation to a hospital.
Stringer Indonesia/Reuters
Pedang,
a 14-year-old male Sumatran tiger suffering from a chronic ear
infection, is treated with acupuncture at the Ramat Gan Safari near Tel
Aviv, Israel.
It’s time for students to heave a collective groan and start hitting
the books again. While PETA doesn’t condone copycatting, there are many
brainy animals who would be great cats to copy from if your kids found
themselves seated next to one. As hundreds of studies have shown, other
animals can understand cause-and-effect relationships, form abstract
thoughts, solve problems, use language, make tools and more—just like
us.
For example, in algebra class, your kids should buddy up with a
dolphin. These math-minded mammals rely on complex nonlinear mathematics
to navigate the vast ocean and find food.
For help with sociology, hire a rat for tutoring. Empathetic rats
will free their restrained cagemates, even if it means they will then
have to share a mound of chocolate. So they’ll have no problem helping
your kids learn about patterns of behavior in social groups.
Would-be broadcasters who sign up for speech classes will find a
whale of a class partner in a sperm whale. These whales use different
accents to identify members of their extended family and whales from
other regions of the world.
Bees could be a huge help in political science. When a decision
affects the whole hive, they put it to a vote. So no matter which side
of the aisle students’ political beliefs fall on, bees can help them
understand the democratic process.
In physical education, blackpoll warblers should always get picked
first. Every fall, these tiny birds make the 1,700-mile trip from New
England to the Caribbean without stopping. So if your children
have to run laps, thinking about a blackpoll warbler’s grueling trek
will make them feel a whole lot better about it.
College students struggling with engineering courses should try to
sit next to a beaver. The dams these natural builders make increase
water supplies for farms, help prevent erosion and improve fish and
wildlife habitats. Scientists are even starting to turn to beavers for
tips on dealing with climate change.
In psychology, students can never go wrong studying with an elephant.
These highly intelligent animals have complex social structures and
relationships so intimate that they flirt with one another and even
argue about directions. Elephants will likely always be up for a rousing
“Mars vs. Venus” debate.
For language arts classes, baboons are a student’s best bet. These
clever monkeys can tell whether a group of letters is a real word or
just gobbledygook—and they might even help out with that Grapes of Wrath paper that went awry.
For help studying for just about any other class, encourage your kids
to get chummy with goldfish, who have longer sustained attention spans
than we do. In a study done by Microsoft, goldfish were able to
concentrate for nine seconds, while humans managed to do so for only
eight.
And if your kids are looking to make some new friends this school
year, help them get in good with crows. When a girl named Gabi started
feeding crows in her garden, the birds recognized that they’d made a
friend and started waiting for her to get off the bus. They also
expressed their thanks by leaving her gifts, including a pearl-colored
heart, an earring and a tiny piece of metal with the word “best” printed
on it. The crows have even found and returned objects that Gabi’s
family lost outside.
But perhaps the most important thing we can learn from other animals
is compassion. Once we learn more about animals’ intelligence, needs and
interests, we begin to recognize that it is our duty to treat them with
respect for who they are—rather than what they can do for us.
This viral story has made millions of us go “awwww!”
According to the tale: “A mother tiger lost her cubs and became
depressed. She wouldn’t eat and drink and zoo staff didn’t know what to
do to help, until they tricked her into adopting a group of piglets
dressed up in stripes.”
If this sounds far-fetched to you, and it should. And yet so many
people have reblogged, shared and otherwise believed the pictures, with
no thought at all for the absurdity of the tale. For this photo is
nothing but a sick ploy to lure tourists and garner attention – from a
zoo with a horrible reputation – the Sriracha Tiger Zoo in Thailand.
This zoo frequently separates babies from mothers and swaps them with
a different species, resulting in stress and psychological problems.
The zoo’s website
promises: “Hold the tiger cub in your arms, feeding milk and take a
memorable picture. See how the sow can play a role of the tiger cubs’
nanny.” If that wasn’t enough, the zoo also has a daily tiger show, with
cats forced to jump through rings of fire, and elephants are made to
carry people around the park and do tricks for them. The cubs are also
passed around for photos with the guests, which leads onto the next
topic…
Biologist, science communicator and comedian Simon Watt
founded the society because he was bored of people always asking
questions about the same more aesthetically pleasing endangered species,
like pandas and tigers. “I do a lot of lectures about biology and
spreading the word about conservation as a whole,” he told BuzzFeed
Science. “I got very bored of people always asking the same questions
about the same species.”
There’s a very good reason male proboscis monkeys
have huge, fleshy noses: because the female proboscis monkeys can’t get
enough of it. Sadly, over the last 40 years, the numbers of proboscis
monkeys have decreased rapidly.
Aye-ayes are nocturnal creatures unique to the island of Madagascar. Many native Madagascans consider the aye-aye to be an omen of bad luck, which is why it is often hunted and killed.
Bald-headed uakari
are social, intelligent creatures. However, they currently face
extinction since their habitat is threatened by the timber industry, and
they are often hunted by indigenous peoples for food.
Pig-nosed turtles
are very large freshwater turtles. They can be found in northern
Australia and southern New Guinea. Their noses resemble a pigs snout,
which is where they get their name.
The Titicaca water frog is nicknamed the “scrotum frog” because of
the extremely loose skin that hangs from its body. Its population has
rapidly declined over the past 20 years, mostly due to over-harvesting
for human consumption.
The greater adjutant
has a slow gait resembling a military officer’s, which is where it gets
its name. They have a very small population, declining rapidly.
Watt’s favourite
ugly animal is the blue-grey taildropper slug. “If you scare it, its bum
falls off” he said. “It’s a very cool way of avoiding predators. If
something grabs hold of you, you can just lose your tail.”
Simon Watt
The society focuses on animals that are locally or globally endangered.
They hold events including comedy tours where
six comedians each champion a different endangered species. At the end
the audience votes and the winner becomes the “Ugly Animal Mascot” for
that city or town.
Earlier this year, Dublin voted for the lesser horseshoe bat to be
the city’s ugly animal mascot. “I don’t think it’s globally endangered
but it’s locally endangered there,” Watt said. “[It] meant that the
people in the audience could go out and do something a bit more
hands-on.”
“We think it’s possible that maybe 200 or so species are becoming extinct every single day,” Watt said.
“The crisis is as bad as that. We’re trying to
get more people talking about conservation as a whole. Using comedy to
talk about it is as good a way as any.”
You can find out more about the society on their website, or find them on Twitter.